Specialist in Employment
Former GB cyclist loses employment tribunal appeal against British Cycling
Former Great Britain cyclist Jess Varnish has lost her employment tribunal appeal against British Cycling.
Ms. Varnish has spent years in a legal battle over her claim she should be considered an employee of British Cycling or UK Sport and therefore should be subject to certain protections under law – including sick pay, a pension and the right to sue for unfair dismissal.
If successful, her case could have had far reaching implications for professional athletes and sport funding bodies.
Following a two-day remote hearing in May, the judge, Mr Justice Choudhury, said yesterday (15/07/2020): “The [original] tribunal was entitled to conclude, based on an evaluative judgment taking account of all relevant factors, that the claimant was not an employee or a worker. The tribunal had not erred in its approach to the assessment of employee status and nor had it reached conclusions that no reasonable tribunal, properly directed, could have reached.”
If Varnish, a former world silver medallist, had been deemed an employee, it would have allowed her to pursue a claim against both British Cycling and UK Sport for unfair dismissal and sex discrimination.
But the tribunal decided that the use of public funds from the National Lottery to provide coaching, the lack of remuneration from British Cycling to Ms Varnish and a grant from UK Sport that took the place of ‘wages’ was inconsistent with being an employee or a worker.
In law, it is important to consider the difference between an employee, a worker and being self-employed. The employment tribunal likened Jess Varnish’ position to a student receiving a grant and ruled she could not, therefore, be seen as an employee of British Cycling or UK Sport.
Of course, this does not just apply to elite athletes. Companies must consider how employees have employment rights that are not given to freelancers, such as the right to holiday pay, statutory sick pay, maternity or paternity leave and redundancy rights.
The designation as a worker gives lesser protection than an employee but still affords some protection, for example, under the Working Time regulations, national minimum wage and paid holiday.
Jess Varnish fell into neither the employed or worker category and the appeal tribunal rejected her submission that the services provided by British Cycling amounted to remuneration, finding that they were “benefits”.
* The featured image is a generic representation of an elite cyclist and is not a picture of Ms Varnish
Disclaimer: Nothing in the Legal Insights section and this blog is intended to provide legal or other professional advice and, if readers are interested, they should consider taking separate legal or other professional advice accordingly.
Meet our lawyers
- Our Agriculture & Estates Experts
- Our Banking & Finance Experts
- Our Business & Corporate Experts
- Our Charities & Social Enterprise Experts
- Our Commercial Contracts Experts
- Our Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution Experts
- Our Construction Experts
- Our Data Protection & Information Governance Experts
Our business model encourages true diversity, offering the opportunity for entrepreneurial lawyers from all backgrounds and legal career profilesContact us
- Agriculture & Estates
- Banking & Finance
- Business & Corporate
- Charities & Social Enterprise
- Commercial Contracts
- Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution
- Covid-19 legal support
- Data Protection & Information Governance
- Employee Incentives
- Family Law & Mediation
- Franchising & Licensing
- Insolvency & Corporate Recovery
- Intellectual Property
- IT, Telecoms & Digital
- Minerals, Environment & Renewable Energy
- Private Client
- Property Development – Commercial
- Property Development – Residential
- Property Litigation
- Real Estate
- Sports, Media & Entertainment
- Trade & Investment
We pursue excellence in every aspect of our work, aiming to deliver quality, innovation and the highest standards of serviceContact us